...rière (côté gauche) afin de ne pas avoir la même largeur que la porte patio. - Reduce the size of the window on the back wall (left side) to not be the same width as the patio door. Plan nº20 : 1050, Dumfries -...
Learn more...Plan N°11 : 2358, Lucerne pour « Remplacement des fenêtres fixes par des fenêtres rétractables – Baccaro »; REFUSÉ pour les raisons suivantes: « Bien que les locataires souhaitent ouvrir leurs espaces à l'exté...
Learn more...alité n'a pas l'intention de reprendre les Lieux Loués pour ses propres fins; WHEREAS the Town does not intend to take back the Rented Premises for its own purposes; ATTENDU QUE le Locataire n'est pas en défaut de respecter les dispo...
Learn more..."Approval of the option with a stucco/acrylic finish on the upper level and 1st garage vol ume is required to be setback an additional 12’’. Material sample board and colors required for final approval"; D’approuver les...
Learn more...Subject : Adoption of second Draft By -law No. 1310-165 to amend Zoning By- law No. 1310 with respect to the side setbacks of one- storey buildings located on Graham Boulevard between Algonquin Avenue and Saint-Clare Road...
Learn more...y this By- law includes zone I-103 ; (zone bounded by Côte-de- Liesse R oad, Devonshire Road, Devonshire R oad back lots, Ferrier street, the eastern boundary of the industr ial sector, the southern boundary of the industrial secto...
Learn more...e object of this application is to legalize, in accordance with Minor Variance By -law No. 1312, the left side setback for the existing building at 1. 94 m, encroaching by 0. 04 m on the 1.98 m minimum setback required at t he...
Learn more...5 . The object of this application is to legalize, in accordance with Minor Variance By -law No. 1312, the rear setback for the existing building at 2.86 m, encroaching by 0. 19 m into the 3.05 m minimum setback required at...
Learn more...object of this application is to legalize, in accordance with Minor Variance By -law No. 1312, the right side setback for the existing building at 1. 88 m, encroaching by 0. 1 m on the 1.98 m minimum setback required at t he...
Learn more...m. The object of this application is to legalize, in accordance with Minor Variance By -law No. 1312, the rear setback for the existing building at 4.02 m, encroaching 0.48 m into the required minimum setback of 4.50 m....
Learn more...e object of this application is to legalize, in accordance with Minor Variance By -law No. 1312, the left side setback for the existing building at 1. 72 m, encroaching by 0. 26 m on the 1.98 m minimum setback required at t he...
Learn more...1 . The object of this application is to legalize, in accordance with Minor Variance By -law No. 1312, the rear setback for the existing building at 5.81 m, encroaching by 0. 19 m on the 6 m minimum setback required by Zoning...
Learn more.... The object of this application is to legalize, in accordance with Minor Variance By -law No. 1312, the rear setback at 5.45 m for the existing building , encroaching by 0.55 m on the 6 m minimum setback required by Zoning...
Learn more...n° 1441. The object of this application is to legalize, in accordance with Minor Variance By-law No. 1312, the front setback at 4.47 m for the existing solarium, encroaching by 3.03 m on the 7.5 m minimum setback required by Zoning By- Law No...
Learn more...441. The object of this application is to legalize, in accordance with Minor Variance By-law No. 1312, the left side setback at 1.61 m for the existing building, encroaching by 0.79 m on the 2.4 m minimum setback required by Zonin g By-Law No...
Learn more...The object of this application is to legalize, in accordance with Minor Variance By-law No. 1312, the right side setback at 1.80 m for the existing building, encroaching by 0.2 m on the 2 m minimum setbacks required at time of constru...
Learn more...e principale existante et les parties existantes en brique ; - preserve the two chimneys, the veranda, the volume setback to the right of the existing main facade and the existing brickwork; - le bâtiment est trop massif dans sa...
Learn more...t By -law No. 1441 -13 to amend Zoning By -law No. 1441 with respect to the number of storeys, height, setbacks and the floor area ratio in zone H -726 . Conformé ment à la Loi sur l’aménagement et l’urbanisme (RL...
Learn more...e object of this application is to legalize, in accordance with Minor Variance By -law No. 1312, the left side setback for the existing building at 1. 97 m, encroaching by 0. 01 m on the 1.98 m minimum setback required at t he...
Learn more...e object of this application is to legalize, in accordance with Minor Variance By -law No. 1312 , the left side setback for the existing building at 1 ,78 m, encroaching by 0.2 0 m on the 1.98 m minimum setback required at the...
Learn more...e object of this application is to legalize, in accordance with Minor Variance By -law No. 1312, the left side setback for the existing building at 1. 88 m, encroaching by 0. 1 m on the 1.98 m minimum setback required at t he...
Learn more...: 79 Simcoe pour « Agrandissement en cour arrière au RDC » sous la réserve suivante : Plan no. 6: 79 Simcoe for "Backyard extension on ground floor''; subject to the following: - les élévations proposées sont acceptées m...
Learn more.... The object of this application is to legalize , in accordance with Minor Variance By -law No. 1312, the rear setbac k of two existing terraces, encroaching by 2.5 m and 2.9 m into the setback required by the zoning by -law...
Learn more...object of this application is to legalize, in accordance with Minor Variance By -law No. 1312, the left side setback for the existing building at 2.44 m, encroaching by 0. 61 m on the 3.05 m minimum setback required at t he...
Learn more.../ Rockland Reconfiguration of Graham / Rockland intersection Une étude de circulation est requise pour ce réaménagement. Les bacs de plantations sont très endommagés et non sécuritaires. Park Dakin ‐ Réaménagement de 2 intersections Reconfiguration ...
Learn more